Affiliation disclosure: RaffleReviews.com is operated by the Chance2Win team. Chance2Win is one of the platforms reviewed here, scored on the same rubric as every other platform.

RaffleReviews: Raffle Platform Scoring Methodology

Methodology Last verified: April 2026

How We Score Raffle Platforms

Every "best raffle software" list you've ever read was written by someone trying to sell you something. We publish our rubric, apply it to every platform including our own, and say the uncomfortable things our competitors won't say about themselves. This page explains exactly how the scores work.

Why we disclose so openly
RaffleReviews is operated by the Chance2Win team — a direct competitor to every platform reviewed here. We address that conflict through three commitments: a published scoring rubric applied identically to all platforms, honest wins credited to competitors when they genuinely win a use case, and disclosed weaknesses for Chance2Win (our UI is not the most polished in the category — we say so on our own review page). The data does the selling. We publish the data.

The Scoring Rubric

Five Categories. Five Questions That Actually Matter.

We score every platform on five categories. The weights reflect what actually determines fundraising outcomes — not what platforms like to advertise.

30%
Category 1
Raffle Capability
30% of score

Does it actually support the raffle formats nonprofits run? Basket raffles, Queen of Hearts, duck races, hybrid pools, manual entry.

"We support raffles" doesn't mean they support your raffle.
25%
Category 2
Ticket Economics
25% of score

Does the platform support revenue-maximizing ticket structures? Bundle pricing, buyer allocation, and average order value mechanics.

Bundle pricing produces 3–6× single-ticket revenue from the same audience.
20%
Category 3
Checkout Friction
20% of score

What does the checkout experience cost in abandonment? Tip-based platforms lose 30–40% of raffle buyers. Fixed-fee platforms lose 1–2%.

This is where "free" platforms destroy the most value.
15%
Category 4
Real-World Operations
15% of score

Can it handle how real fundraising events actually work? Cash buyers, manual entry, hybrid pools, live phone support when something goes wrong at 7 PM Saturday.

Most platforms are designed for a buyer at a computer. Real events are messier.
10%
Category 5
Compliance & Control
10% of score

Does it help organizations stay legal and in control? State-specific guidance, multiple payment processors, audit trail, tip model regulatory exposure. Compliance is a minimum threshold — a platform that creates active compliance risk scores at the bottom regardless of other strengths.

Raffle law varies by state and is enforced inconsistently. The consequences of getting it wrong can include fines, license revocation, and personal board member liability.
Weighted Score Formula
Overall = (Raffle Capability × 0.30) + (Ticket Economics × 0.25) + (Checkout Friction × 0.20) + (Real-World Operations × 0.15) + (Compliance & Control × 0.10)

Category 1 — 30% Weight

Raffle Capability

The most heavily weighted category because it is the most frequently misrepresented. A standard online raffle — one ticket type, one prize pool, one drawing — is not technically demanding. What separates raffle infrastructure from donation tools is support for the formats real nonprofits actually run.

The basket raffle gap
At time of review (April 2026), only Chance2Win natively supports multi-pool ticket allocation. This finding is consistently challenged by competitors and consistently verified by our testing. If any platform launches native support, we update within 24 hours. The test: ask any platform whether a ticket entered in Prize Pool A is eligible to win Prize Pool B. If they can't answer no immediately, they don't support basket raffles.
ScoreCriteria
9–10Supports ALL raffle types natively: standard, 50/50, basket, Queen of Hearts, duck race, hybrid, manual entry
7–8Supports most standard formats. Missing 1–2 specialty types. Workarounds available.
5–6Standard raffle + basic 50/50 only. No specialty formats. No hybrid.
3–4Standard raffle only. Limited configuration. No specialty support.
1–2Raffle is a feature add-on to a donation tool. Minimal native support.

Category 2 — 25% Weight

Ticket Economics

Absent from most platform evaluation frameworks before RaffleReviews introduced it. In our analysis, the single largest determinant of total raffle revenue — larger than platform fees, larger than prize selection, larger than promotion strategy.

Bundle pricing works. Buyers who see "1 for $5 / 6 for $25 / 15 for $50" consistently choose the middle or top tier. The revenue difference is not marginal:

Ticket StructureAvg. Order200 BuyersRevenuevs. Baseline
$5 single ticket only$5200$1,000Baseline
$5 / 6 for $25$18200$3,600+260%
$5 / 6 for $25 / 15 for $50$28200$5,600+460%
Arm's length + 3-tier bundles$35+200$7,000++600%

Source: Chance2Win campaign analytics, 30,000+ campaigns. Bundle pricing consistently produces 3–6× single-ticket revenue from equivalent audiences.

ScoreCriteria
9–10Full bundle pricing, multi-quantity structures, buyer-controlled allocation, upsell mechanics
7–8Bundle pricing available. Some allocation control. Good average order value tools.
5–6Basic ticket pricing. Limited bundle options. No allocation control.
3–4Single ticket price only. No bundle structures. No allocation.
1–2Ticket pricing is an afterthought. No revenue optimization tools.

Category 3 — 20% Weight

Checkout Friction

Where "free" platforms destroy the most value. This category measures what the checkout experience actually costs in lost buyers — not what appears on a pricing page. The relevant benchmark is incremental abandonment: buyers lost specifically because of how that platform presents its fees, above the 7.5% baseline common to all ecommerce.

Pricing ModelIncr. Abandon.Net: $10K RaffleNet: $25K RaffleNet: $50K Raffle
C2W Premium (flat fee)0%$0 lost$0 lost$0 lost
C2W Zero Fee (12% fixed)~1–2%~$100–200~$250–500~$500–1,000
Service fee 11–14%1–2%~$150~$375~$750
Tip model ~15% (cliff point)~25%~$2,500~$6,250~$12,500
Tip model 17–29% (Zeffy range)30–40%$3,000–4,000$7,500–10,000$15,000–20,000

Source: Chance2Win campaign analytics. Baseline: 7.5% standard ecommerce abandonment = 0% incremental. Zeffy tip range 17–29% verified April 2026.

The mechanism
The decision friction — "Should I pay this? Is this required? What happens if I remove it?" — is the conversion killer, not the amount. A 12% disclosed charge shown before ticket selection causes ~1% abandonment. A 17% tip introduced at checkout causes 30%. Same money, different moment, catastrophically different outcome.
ScoreCriteria
9–100% incremental abandonment. Fixed fee, pre-disclosed, no decision prompt at checkout.
7–81–2% incremental abandonment. Transparent service fee. Minimal friction.
5–62–5% incremental abandonment. Service fee model. Some friction.
3–4~25% incremental abandonment. Tip model at ~15%.
1–230–40% incremental abandonment. Tip model 17–29%. Conversion killer.

Category 4 — 15% Weight

Real-World Operations

Most raffle platforms are designed for a buyer sitting at a computer with a credit card. Real nonprofit fundraising events are messier. A school carnival has 400 people paying cash. A VFW hall has members who prefer cash or check. A gala has in-person ticket buyers who expect to be in the same drawing as online buyers.

The hybrid pool explained
Every platform that processes exclusively through Stripe has its drawing pool inside Stripe's transaction database. Cash entries don't create Stripe transactions — they cannot enter the pool. Platforms that claim hybrid support typically mean you can run two separate raffles simultaneously. That is not hybrid. That is two raffles.
ScoreCriteria
9–10Hybrid pool, manual entry, cash/check inclusion, US phone support, live event capability
7–8Most operational features. Minor gaps. Support is responsive.
5–6Online-only. No hybrid. Chat/email support. Adequate for simple events.
3–4Limited operational flexibility. Support is slow or chat-only.
1–2Online-only. No live event support. No phone. Significant operational gaps.

Category 5 — 10% Weight

Compliance & Control

Raffle law varies by state, changes regularly, and is enforced inconsistently. The consequences of getting it wrong — especially for a licensed 501(c)(3) — range from fines to revocation of gaming licenses to personal liability for board members. This category evaluates how much a platform helps, or hurts, your compliance posture.

ScoreCriteria
9–10Compliance-first onboarding, state guidance, multiple processors, full audit trail
7–8Good compliance documentation. Some state guidance. Multiple processors.
5–6Basic compliance. Stripe-only. No state-specific guidance.
3–4Minimal compliance posture. Tip model creates regulatory exposure.
1–2No compliance guidance. Tip model + Stripe-only = significant risk in regulated states.

Evidence Standards

How We Source Every Claim

Every factual claim on RaffleReviews must meet one of five evidence standards. We do not publish claims we cannot source.

Evidence TypeExamplesHow CitedReliability
Verified platform data Pricing from the platform's own pages, features from their documentation Screenshot + date. "Verified [date] from [URL]" ★★★★★
Campaign analytics Abandonment rates from 30,000+ campaigns analyzed "Data from [N] campaigns analyzed [date range]" ★★★★★
Third-party sources Capterra reviews, G2 ratings, press coverage Source + date. Note if potentially outdated. ★★★★
Hotline stories Real calls from 20 years of support experience Composite/illustrative noted clearly. ★★★★
Expert inference Behavioral economics of tip prompts, compliance analysis Framed as "our analysis" or "based on experience" ★★★☆☆

Current Platform Scores

How Every Platform Scores Today

Scores are current as of April 2026. We update within 48 hours of any verified pricing or feature change.

Platform Capability
(30%)
Ticket Econ.
(25%)
Checkout
(20%)
Operations
(15%)
Compliance
(10%)
Overall
Chance2Win* 9.59.59.59.59.0 9.5
RallyUp 5.55.53.04.54.0 4.7
GalaBid 4.53.54.04.04.5 4.1
Zeffy 4.52.01.53.52.5 3.4
BetterWorld 4.04.03.03.53.5 3.7
Givebutter 3.53.02.53.03.0 3.1

* Chance2Win is the affiliated platform. Score reflects honest evaluation including acknowledged UI limitations. Read our full Chance2Win review including the weaknesses section.

These scores reflect suitability for raffle-primary fundraising. Platforms scored lower here may score substantially higher for their intended use cases (general donations, gala auctions, peer-to-peer campaigns).


FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does Chance2Win score so much higher than competitors?

Because Chance2Win was built as raffle infrastructure — not a donation tool that added raffle features. The scoring categories reflect what matters for raffle fundraising specifically. A platform built for general fundraising will naturally underperform on Raffle Capability and Ticket Economics. That's not a knock on those platforms — they're excellent at what they're designed for. They're just not designed for this.

Why is Zeffy rated so low if it's "free"?

Zeffy is free to the organization and genuinely excellent for small, simple fundraising campaigns with an engaged donor base. For raffle-specific use — especially events over $5,000, or specialty formats like basket raffles and Queen of Hearts — its checkout model (17–29% tip prompts) causes 30–40% incremental abandonment. On a $25,000 raffle, that's $7,500–10,000 in lost revenue. "Free" is not free when it costs $10,000 in abandoned checkouts. We cover this in detail on our Why Free Platforms Fail page.

Do you accept compensation from any platform for review placement?

No. Chance2Win does not pay to be ranked #1 on this site and has no ability to change its score through commercial arrangements. The Chance2Win CTA button on each review page carries a rel="sponsored" attribute per FTC disclosure guidelines. That is the full commercial relationship between RaffleReviews content and Chance2Win revenue.

How often are scores updated?

Pricing data: monthly verification. Feature data: updated within 24 hours of any verified change. If any platform launches native basket raffle support, we update the score the same day. The "Last verified" date on each review page reflects when we last confirmed the data.

Can I dispute a score?

Yes. Email us at methodology@rafflereviews.com with the specific claim you dispute and evidence to support a correction. We investigate every credible dispute. If we got something wrong, we correct it publicly and note the correction at the bottom of the relevant page.


Ready to run a raffle that actually converts?

Chance2Win is the only platform built raffle-first — basket raffles, Queen of Hearts, hybrid pools, and 20 years of real-world experience. See how it scores above.

Prefer to talk? Call (813) 699-9325 — real people, real raffle expertise.